Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть Special Report #3 — 10 U.S.C. § 12406: Presidential Authority & the Court’s Misplaced Focus

  • The Republic - If You Can Keep It
  • 2026-01-09
  • 355
Special Report #3 — 10 U.S.C. § 12406: Presidential Authority & the Court’s Misplaced Focus
  • ok logo

Скачать Special Report #3 — 10 U.S.C. § 12406: Presidential Authority & the Court’s Misplaced Focus бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно Special Report #3 — 10 U.S.C. § 12406: Presidential Authority & the Court’s Misplaced Focus или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку Special Report #3 — 10 U.S.C. § 12406: Presidential Authority & the Court’s Misplaced Focus бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео Special Report #3 — 10 U.S.C. § 12406: Presidential Authority & the Court’s Misplaced Focus

In this Special Report #3 clip, Rob & Lou break down how the court interpreted 10 U.S.C. § 12406, the statute that authorizes the President to call state National Guard units into federal service. While the majority zeroed in on subsection (3) — the requirement that the President be “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States”— Rob & Lou explain why that reading misses the broader constitutional and statutory framework.

This segment highlights Justice Brett Kavanaugh's reading of the law how the President can rely on the Insurrection Act and § 12406 together, and why it is impractical and historically unsupported to require the President to exhaust or deploy active‑duty forces before turning to the National Guard. The statute was designed to give the President flexibility, not to impose a rigid sequencing requirement that would delay federal response in moments of crisis.

Rob & Lou walk through how the majority’s narrow focus on subsection (3) ignores the statute’s other triggers — invasion and rebellion — and overlooks the President’s Article II authority as Commander in Chief. They explain how the dissent emphasized the real‑world operational needs of federal response, and why the President’s ability to call up Guard units has always been understood as a practical, immediate tool, not a last resort.

If you want to understand how courts interpret presidential authority during domestic emergencies — and why § 12406 remains central to that debate — this clip delivers the clarity the public rarely receives.

#TheRepublicIfYouCanKeepIt #ConstitutionalLaw #NationalGuard #CivicEducation #FederalAuthority #RuleOfLaw

🎧 Listen to the Full Podcast
YouTube:    / @therepublicifyoucankeepit  
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9u...
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
iHeartRadio: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-th...
Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/8f3...
Pandora: https://www.pandora.com/podcast/the-r...
Deezer: https://www.deezer.com/us/show/100249...

⚖️ Disclaimer
This educational content is provided for public understanding of law, history, and civic processes. It does not provide legal advice, create an attorney‑client relationship, or advocate for any political party, candidate, or campaign. This content is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not advocate for or against any political candidate, party, referendum, ballot measure, or public policy. It is not intended to influence the outcome of any election or referendum, voting behavior, or any legislative or regulatory process at the U.S. federal, state, regional, or local level, or at the EU, national, regional, or local level.
Copyrighted materials appearing in this content are used under Fair Use for purposes of commentary, criticism, education, and analysis (17 U.S.C. § 107). Views expressed are for informational and educational purposes only and do not represent any government agency or employer, past or present.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]