3BM42 Mango APFSDS-T Vs Chobham (Composite) Simplified Armor

This simulation shows that, How 3BM42 Mango APFSDS-T is effective against the Composite NERA Armor layouts.It highlights the whole Armour penetration through animation and depicts various penetration angle views. It is classified armor and might present inside the Chieftain Mk. 5/2.

For the Chieftain Mk. 5/2 the available drawings from declassified British documents include a bit less information on the armor layout - the armor is only shown as black plates without showing the actual layers forming the plates. However it is known that the turret armor for the Chieftain Mk. 5/2 would utilize seven Chobham plates additional to the base armor (which is aluminium).

3VBM17/3BM42 (3BM42 "Mango") APFSDS-T: Developed under the research topic "Mango", the 3BM42 is an advanced Soviet long-rod APFSDS-T round that entered service in 1986. Specifically designed to defeat modern composite (NERA) armor arrays.

Please subscribe to our channel:    / @extremeengineeringsimulati5627  
Credits: www.bensound.com

Other Similar Videos
T72B Turret Armor Vs 120 mm M829 APFSDS-T #NERA VS APFSDS
   • T72B Turret Armor Vs 120 mm M829 APFS...  
1. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
   • 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 B...  
2. Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Failed Armor Penetration
   • Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate ...  
3.120 mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate
   • 120 mm KE M829 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Arm...  
4. 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2
   • 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration o...  
5.7.62 NATO X 50 mm Bullet Vs Armor Steel Plate # Armor Penetration Simulation
   • 7.62 X 51mm NATO Bullet Vs Armor Stee...  
6. BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
   • BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Pie...  
7.Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing Ammunition
   • Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinfo...  
8.7_62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest #Armor Piercing Simulation
   • 7.62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel ...  
9.120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation.
   • 120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 AP...  
10.Low Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation
   • Bomb (Kinetic Energy Penetrator) Vs R...  
11. Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulation
   • 90 mm t33 Vs German Pz Kpfw V (Panthe...  
12.125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation
   • 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # A...  
13. 3VBM3/3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS #APFSDS Collision
   • 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS Vs 120 mm M829 APF...  
14. APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor
   • APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Energetic Reactiv...  
15. 120 mm M829A2 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 Turret
   • 120 mm M829A2 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 T...  
17. 3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS Part 2
   • 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs 120 mm M829 A...