Primal fundraising and reciprocal alliances: I'm with them! (The Primal Fundraiser 2)

Описание к видео Primal fundraising and reciprocal alliances: I'm with them! (The Primal Fundraiser 2)

From "The Primal Fundraiser: Game Theory and The Natural Origins of Effective Fundraising"
http://www.encouragegenerosity.com/Th...

REFERENCES CITED
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396
Bateson, M., Nettle D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412-414; Haley, K. J. & Fessler, D.M.T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245-256.
Boyd, R. (1988). Is the repeated prisoner's dilemma a good model of reciprocal altruism? Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(2-4), 211-222
Carter, G. (2014). The reciprocity controversy. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1(3), 368-386. p. 368.
Carter, G., Chen, T., & Razik, I. (2020). The theory of reciprocal altruism. In T. Shackelford (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of evolutionary psychology. Sage.
Delton, A. W., Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2011). Evolution of direct reciprocity under uncertainty can explain human generosity in one-shot encounters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(32), 13335-13340.
Dugatkin, L. A., & Alfieri, M. (1992). Interpopulational differences in the use of the tit-for-tat strategy during predator inspection in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Evolutionary Ecology, 6(6), 519-526.
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 17-52.
Krupka, E. L., & Croson, R. T. (2016). The differential impact of social norms cues on charitable contributions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 128, 149-158
Lombardo, M. P. (1985). Mutual restraint in tree swallows: a test of the Tit for Tat model of reciprocity. Science, 227 (4692), 1363-1365.
Magnus, D. (1958). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Bionomie und Ethologie des Kaisermantels Argynnis paphia L.(Lep. Nymph.) I. Über optische Auslöser von Anfliegereaktionen und ihre Bedeutung für das Sichfinden der Geschlechter. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 15(4), 397-426.
Milinski, M., Kulling, D., & Kettler, R. (1990). Tit for tat: Sticklebacks (gasterosteus aculeatus) ‘trusting’a cooperating partner. Behavioral Ecology, 1(1), 7-11.
Morris, P. H., White, J., Morrison, E. R., & Fisher, K. (2013). High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgements of female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 176-181.
Rand, D. G. (2016). Cooperation, fast and slow: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of social heuristics and self-interested deliberation. Psychological Science 27(9), 1192-1206
Rand, D. G., Peysakhovich, A., Kraft-Todd, G. T., et al. (2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications, 5(3677), 1-12.
Sawalhah, M. N., Cibils, A. F., Hu, C., Cao, H., & Holechek, J. L. (2014). Animal-driven rotational grazing patterns on seasonally grazed New Mexico rangeland. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 67(6), 710-714.
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1984). Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308 (5959), 541-543.
Staddon, J. E. R. (1975). A note on the evolutionary significance of "supernormal" stimuli. The American Naturalist, 109(969), 541-545.
Sznycer, D., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2019). The ecological rationality of helping others: Potential helpers integrate cues of recipients' need and willingness to sacrifice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 34-45. p. 35.
Tinbergen, N., & Perdeck, A. C. (1951). On the stimulus situation releasing the begging response in the newly hatched Herring Gull chick (Larus argentatus argentatus Pont.). Behaviour, 3(1), 1-39.
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature, 308 (5955), 181.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке