Cops Thought They Were Tough Until This Happened | First Amendment Audit

Описание к видео Cops Thought They Were Tough Until This Happened | First Amendment Audit

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech and the press, which has been interpreted by courts to include the right to record public officials, including police officers, in the performance of their duties. This right is crucial for ensuring transparency and accountability within law enforcement. In Glik v. Cunniffe (2011), the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that recording public officials in public spaces is a constitutional right, provided the recording does not interfere with their duties.

In the incident at hand, the auditor exercised his First Amendment right by recording outside a police precinct. His actions fall within the protections established by Glik and other precedents, as he was in a public space and not disrupting the officers' duties. However, the encounter escalated when the auditor questioned the legality of the officers' parking practices, potentially provoking a defensive response from the officers.

The officers' directive to move to the sidewalk aligns with their duty to manage public safety. However, the manner in which this directive was enforced raises concerns about the proportionality and necessity of their response. The physical guidance of the auditor to the sidewalk, leading to his handcuffing and detention, may be viewed as excessive, particularly given the non-threatening nature of the auditor's conduct.

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. For a detention to be lawful, officers must have reasonable suspicion that the individual is engaged in criminal activity. In Terry v. Ohio (1968), the Supreme Court established that officers can stop and briefly detain a person based on reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct.

In this case, the auditor was detained for allegedly obstructing traffic and being a danger to himself and others. The reasonableness of this suspicion is questionable, as the video suggests the auditor was not obstructing traffic significantly or posing a clear danger. The escalation to handcuffing and detainment, despite the auditor's continuous assertion of his rights and request for a supervisor, further complicates the assessment of reasonableness.

The auditor accused the officers of ego-driven behavior and retaliatory actions, which implicates potential violations of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983. This statute allows individuals to sue state actors for civil rights violations. Retaliation for exercising constitutional rights is prohibited under this law.

THIS VIDEO IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ..
This video was created to educate citizens about constitutionally protected activities, law, and civilian rights, and emphasize the importance of constitutional awareness.

FAIR USE NOTICE.. this video may contain copyright material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, reviews and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

Disclaimer: NONE of our videos should be considered a "call to action." We are not attorneys. Our videos should not be construed as legal advice. You should seek legal counsel if you believe that you are a victim of police misconduct. The facts presented in our videos are not indicative of our personal opinions. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. The videos shown are designed to be educational, and informative based on the information available at the time the video was published. All claims made are alleged.

Original video:    / @goodguyactivism  

#idrefusal #CopGetsOwned #dismissed #firstamendmentaudit #4thAmendment #CopWatch #Trespassing #Dismissed #copdismissed #RookieCop #1aAudit #Cop #Police #CopsOwned #1stamendmentaudit #Trespassing #rookiecops #4thamendment #5thamendment #walkofshame #1aAudits #copwatch #CopsGetOwned #CopsGettingOwned #lawenforcement

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке