Скачать или смотреть 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation

This Video presents 125 mm smooth bar 3VBM3/3BM9/10 APFSDS-T penetration with Leopard 2 tank. This video present the study on leopard front armor plate angle impact on APFSDS. This video highlights various angle of impact. It is observed that, the 3BM9 is failed to penetrate the leopard-2 tank due to its unique front armor plate angle. APFSDS instead of penetrating it slightly deviates upwards.

The Johnson + Cook material model is used for projectile. High velocity of 1800 m/s is applied to the projectile. The leopard tank 2 have composite armor but in present simulation we assumed rolled homogeneous armor as material.

The Leopard 2 is a main battle tank developed by Krauss-Maffei in the 1970s for the West German Army. While 3BM9 is Armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot tracer or APFSDS-T rounds entered service in 1962 by Soviet Union.

Please subscribe to our channel:    / @extremeengineeringsimulati5627  
Music Credits: https://www.bensound.com/

Other Similar Videos:

1. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
   • 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RH...  
2. Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Failed Armor Penetration
   • Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Fail...  
3.120 mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate
   • 120 mm KE M829 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor In...  
4. 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2
   • 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Alu...  
5.7.62 NATO X 50 mm Bullet Vs Armor Steel Plate # Armor Penetration Simulation
   • 7.62 X 51mm NATO Bullet Vs Armor Steel Pla...  
6. BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
   • BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing...  
7.Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing Ammunition
   • Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced ...  
8.7_62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest #Armor Piercing Simulation
   • 7.62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest ...  
9.120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation.
   • 120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS ...  
10.Low Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation
   • Bomb (Kinetic Energy Penetrator) Vs Reinfo...  
11. Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulation
   • 90 mm t33 Vs German Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Ta...  
12.125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation
   • 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor ...  
13. 3VBM3/3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS #APFSDS Collision
   • 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS Vs 120 mm M829 APFSDS #...  
14. APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor
   • APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Energetic Reactive Armor