Скачать или смотреть Mom`s Been Filing False Prescriptions at Work | Several Court Hearings

Several court hearings, each involving different cases and parties. Here's a summary of each case:

1. Zachary French versus Elizabeth French: This case concerns a motion to enforce a court order granting Zachary French sole legal custody of his daughter, Amelia. Elizabeth French, the defendant, had been filling Amelia's prescription medication without Zachary's permission or that of the prescribing physician. Child Protective Services (CPS) is now investigating Elizabeth's home cleanliness and Amelia's medical care. The court does not hold Elizabeth in contempt but orders her to pay Zachary $1,360 in attorney's fees. A future motion hearing regarding the CPS investigation is anticipated.

2. Kathleen House versus Jonathan House: This case involves a motion for temporary custody, parenting time, support payments, and exclusive use of the marital home. The defendant, Jonathan, vacated the marital home in April 2024 and had sporadic parenting time. The plaintiff, Kathleen, seeks sole physical and legal custody. The court orders joint legal and physical custody with alternating weekly parenting time, maintaining the existing financial arrangement for bills, and granting Kathleen exclusive use of the home. Child support will be calculated based on the Michigan child support formula.

3. Mary Aldering versus Steven Smith: This case focuses on modifying a previous order regarding supervised parenting time. The defendant's mother, initially designated as the supervisor, is no longer willing due to the defendant's erratic behavior and threats. The court amends the order to mandate supervision by Family and Children's Services for approximately 3 months, with the possibility of review and potential modification thereafter.

4. Brittany Mackie versus Kyrie Dukes: The plaintiff failed to appear. The defendant's motion to modify custody, parenting time, and support is acknowledged. The court finds sufficient cause for a hearing but cannot modify custody without an evidentiary hearing, scheduling one for a later date. Supervised parenting time is ordered, contact with Alan Mitchell is prohibited, and the defendant's support payments are suspended pending the hearing.

5. David Carney versus Sean Carney: The defendant, Sean, seeks sole physical and legal custody due to the plaintiff's, David's, assault charge, domestic violence, and threats. The court grants temporary sole physical and legal custody to Sean but orders supervised parenting time for David, with supervision by David's girlfriend or grandmother. Child support will be calculated according to guidelines. Third-party transportation is mandated for David's parenting time.

6. Chelsea Jozwiak versus Ryan Jozwiak: This case involves a dispute over terminating counseling services with Meridissa Katz, who is retiring. The court decides to allow the defendant and children to continue with Ms. Katz if they wish, while recommending Margaret Hunter for co-parenting counseling between the parents.

7. Leslie Odell versus Robert Keech: This hearing addresses a discrepancy in a child support order, where the amount was inexplicably lowered to $3.75. The matter is referred back to the referee for clarification and potential correction.

8. Chanel Smith versus James McKinley: The plaintiff challenges the referee's recommendation on child support, arguing that her income was misrepresented. The court affirms the referee's calculation, noting a potential misstatement of annual income but finding the weekly income calculation to be accurate.

9. Carl [Last Name Unknown] versus [Defendant Name Unknown]: The defendant failed to appear. The court enters final orders, with a minor correction requested by the plaintiff regarding parenting time.

10. Zachary Conley versus Athena Couch: This case is mentioned but details are not provided.

The recurring themes in these cases include disputes over custody arrangements, child support calculations, and the need for supervised parenting time due to concerns about the safety and well-being of the children involved. The judge consistently emphasizes the best interests of the children in making their decisions.

#familycourt #JUDGE #COURT #TRENDING

@courtwatchers
#court
#comedyvideo
#trending
#comedy
#viralshorts
#childsupport
#video
#viral
​#familylaw #familycourt #court #livecourt #law #court #storytime #lawandcrime #childsupport #zoomcourt #courtcam #familycourt #courtdrama #crime #childbenefit #news #childmaintenance #zoomcourt